Skip to content


EMS 2.0? Well, yes it is a dream.

Comments

In a number of emails I have been asked for an outline or “thesis” about what EMS 2.0 is. There was talk awhile back about a national EMS 2.0 organization to begin lobbying for the changes we all want to see. Others asked me for my suggested education requirements and how I expected a volunteer Paramedic already working two jobs to go back to school to keep doing what they want to do.

I have no answers to those questions.

Sometimes when asked I reply that I have all the answers, I just haven’t sorted out what questions they go to yet.

I used the phrase EMS 2.0, and I think Mr Chris Kaiser did as well, because it brings up the image of a reboot, or upgrade.
Many of the Windows 7 features I got are neat, but most of it is based on the same things I liked about Windows 3.1, sure it is full of random errors and can be frustrating, but the system is slowly updating itself.

A few years ago I had had it with my operating system and all the limitations I saw in it and jumped into Linux.
I was under the impression I was savvy enough to make code changes to effect the entire operating capacity of the system. And since I had only a basic understanding of the features I so desperately wanted, I was unable to have the comfortable computing experience I expected. The adventure ended months later with a partitioned hard drive and having to choose an operating system each time it started. Drove me nuts. But those who know how to make it work love it and it works fine.

So when I speak of EMS 2.0, I am indeed aware of the pros and cons of an “upgrade.”

Another list of questions I get is about the comparison to Web 2.0, the movement that led to the communities and user submitted content we call the internet today. I recall the early days of FTP file searching by tree late into the night in college, having the entire internet text based as a few html sites began to sprout up. I compare searching roots and file trees then and the “Web 2.0″ experience we have now and realize that it is the inter-activity of the internet that has made it a community rather than just a marketplace.

There is an element there I can identify with when it comes to EMS. One of the Medical Directors who came by the booth in Baltimore asked me how he could use blogs to get his Paramedics to accept changing their protocols. I told him he should listen to what the patients his Paramedics encounter need and let that guide protocol changes. Then I asked if his medics had any way of approaching him about changes and he looked as if no one had ever suggested a medic could ever suggest a policy change, let alone present evidence in support.
“An open door and an honest opinion goes a long way in folks feeling like you care about what they’re doing,” I told him.
“No, I need them to do what I say.” he replied and I couldn’t speak against that because I am not an MD, nor in his system, understanding his troubles and challenges.

So where does this all fit into the EMS 2.0 landscape?

I dunno.

We need change, we need a new re-thinking of EMS, what it is, what we’re doing and why, how, where, everything needs to be re-examined and reformed based on new research, response models, patient presentations and care taker abilities.
How that can happen on a National level all at once is something I would love to see happen, but we all know here are far too many feifdoms, unions, politicians, companies and providers who will fight tooth and nail to maintain the status quo, regardless of the benefits.
There are those who will not move forward no matter what they are shown or told. And not all of them are the old salt medics. Some of the new kids on the EMS block feel they have made it and will just sleep through their refresher every two years and keep drawing the pay check.
Departments will fight to keep licensing requirements low so as not to have to pay their people to seek out education, possibly because the higher educated can draw a premium at the next service over.

From my lofty perch here with my education and high paying EMS job you may think me a dreamer with all this CoEMS and EMS 2.0 talk and you’d be right.
But the Chronicles was a dream a year ago and now we’re set to travel the world doing exactly what we want to do, explore what EMS means.
So I’m going to keep dreaming about EMS 2.0 and hope one day I can meet a crew from a department somewhere who both have an advanced education and operate under protocols or guidelines that give them the flexibility to treat, transport or transfer citizens, clients and patients based on what they need, not what they or some future lawsuit want.
I think we can all agree on that.

But how do we get there? We all get there in different ways at different times, hence the trouble in explaining EMS 2.0 to people at different levels of different systems.

There can’t really be an EMS 2.0 “thesis” or guide, but more of a mission statement, and that I am thinking about.
So far three main principles come to mind and how to expand on them will be up to you. They will certainly mean different things to different people, and that is one of the things I love about it.

My EMS 2.0 is based on three main concepts.
Technology
Teaching
Trust

Using technology to improve our ability to assess and treat,
Advancing our educational levels to not only learn more about our patients and communities, but teach them what we can and can’t do.
We have to earn the trust of those who give us the power to do what we do in order to do more.

In short I need some expensive gear, a pricey college education and then let me go do what I’ve learned and proven competent to do. Exactly what that is will depend on your community.

The future is coming and we as a Profession have a chance to not only make ourselves a respected part of the health care system, but excel in providing care in an innovative manner that can release the burdens the current system is collapsing under.

It is a dream. But it had to start somewhere and if that is all it is for now, I’ll take it, but something is happening out there and I want to be ready if my Chief asks my, “What do you think we should do?”

What are the three concepts your EMS 2.0 platform would fight for? Let me know.

Rain Gutters

Comments

We moved into this house about 2 years ago and have been finding little problems here and there as most homeowners do.

Aside from mystery sprinklers (don’t get me started), with recent storms I’ve found limitations on the capacity of my gutter system.

Sure it carries the water from the roof along the gutter to the downspout.  Sure it ties into an underground system that drains into the sewers, but there’s all sorts of non water stuff getting in there.

At our old house we got new gutters installed and had a chance to install a really great, but expensive, product that blocks non water items from getting into the gutters.  With 2 large pepper trees overhead it made the next rainy season far easier to cope with.

But here we have a different problem and a different system.  It would appear that the underground drainage system that ties into the sewer has either failed or become clogged with debris, roots, small woodland creatures, something other than water for sure.

During one of our recent storms I spent hours out in the driving rain trying to flush what I thought was a simple clog only to find it was systemic on that one side of the house.

One side no problems at all, the other hopelessly clogged.

With water backing up against the foundation of the house I had to stop the immediate damage and climbed back up and clogged the downspout.  That sent the water in that gutter over to the other downspout near the front of the house.  My problem was not solved, only no longer an immediate problem.  But now water was backing up at another location, just not right against the foundation and in plain sight.

With the family driving the wife nuts inside (toddlers hate rainy days) and my hands cold I came inside hoping to tackle the problem another day.

When that day came I could only install a patch of the same system that was in place before, a tube running from the downspout off the side of the house towards the neighbor’s yard. (He’s never home, he won’t notice.)  I unclogged the downspout and water rushed into the pipe I dug a trench for and away the water went.

Problem kinda dealt with but still not solved.  The other spout on that side of the house has o elevation where I can make a trench without digging up most of the yard.  Plus, now it’s a huge mud puddle.

I’m not sure what the solution to my problems are, but I know what I have isn’t working as well as it should on one side.  And I don’t think breaking out the concrete on the other side of the house to improve a working system is a good idea either.

I’m researching other ways other folks are handling similar problems and hope to learn a little something that can help me with my troubles.

I just hope I can come up with something before the next storm rattles in and makes more trouble for me.

Thanks for letting me change gears,

HM

Behold! A Meetup of epic proportions!

Comments

It’s being billed as

The Largest Fire/EMS Blog meet up of all time

and it is in Baltimore March 5th, 8pm.

Bloggers from the FireEMSBlogs network will be there and not just Mark and myself.

If you are a blogger and will be there, leave your info in the comments and I’ll add you to my list.

All are welcome, bloggers, readers, fans, stalkers, ex-wives (only odd numbered ones), industry reps (if you’re buying), Chiefs in uniform (so we can drink in front of you), small woodland creatures (so cute), #TeamHappy, anyone from the 1996 Eden Prarie Varsity Lacrosse Team, Firefighters, Paramedics, EMTs, conference goers, Instructors, Destructors (OK, not really destructors), my Mom (Hi MA!), retired members, volunteers, paid, paid/call…

…if I left you out you’re invited.

Uno Pizzeria Harborplace- Pratt Street Pavilion, 2nd Floor
201 East Pratt Street
Harborplace
Baltimore, MD 21202
410-625-5900

Sponsored by George Washington University, JEMS and FireEMSBlogs.com

Special thanks to Chris Kaiser

Walk / Don’t Walk

Comments

don't walkI had no idea that walking patients to the ambulance was such a risque thing to do.

Since the debut of Chronicles of EMS I have been seeing posts and getting emails about how folks are glad they saw me walking patients to the ambulance because it proves I’m willing to show the cameras what’s really happening.

Well, news flash – I walk patients to the ambulance all the time.

When their condition permits, of course.

But when Bubba Fishbiscuit calls because he is out of “brain pills” again, or sprains his wrist guess what folks, he walks if he wants to.

I have even been known to walk patients INTO the ER! AAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!

My question to you is, why aren’t you?

If your patient doesn’t need the cot, or want it, why are you “required” to use it? And the stair chair too?

I dug through my County Guidelines, Department Protocols and even Department rules and regulations and found nothign about folks not being able to use their good legs when they want to.

Forcing people to make you carry them is insulting.

“No Ma’am, we have to for liability reasons” is the exact opposite of what you’re doing. By letting them walk they are responsible for their actions. When you carry and drop them, well, that was your call.

So why is it that so many Paramedics and EMTs were taken aback when I allowed people who were walking around when they called me and walking still when I arrived to walk into the ambulance?

can't billIs it billing?

Is it?

Is the ability to be reimbursed for the transport more important than the patient? If you are required to carry or cot everyone no matter what, then yes.

Ask your Medical Director about walking patients to the rig who have non life threatening injuries or who are stable per their history and protocols and request to walk on their own, watch what they say.

Now go ask your billing department how hard it is to get Medicare to reimburse when you start your narrative with “Pt ambulated without assistance to Medic99.” Watch their eyes catch fire.

Your protocols should outweigh your policies because your policies cover you and your protocols your patients and we’ve covered more than once in this forum that this thing isn’t about us, it’s about them.

If Bubba’s had a few too many, he gets carried. If he’s going to reach out on the stairwell and twist in the chair causing my knee to go out, who’s fault is that? Bubba’s for reaching out or mine for not helping him down the stairs in the first place.

Have a serious talk with your system administrators if you are not permitted to let your patients walk to the ambulance. Show them the Chronicles episode and show them that I do it all the time and, gasp, no one dies.

But, and I hate that I have to add this, follow your established policies and protocols until otherwise advised by those who have the power to change things.

What a Weekend

Comments

What a weekend indeed. As our regular readers are aware, it appears those 26 exhausting days back in November were worth it after all. Even though only the first half of our Project was turned into the Chronicles of EMS, the entire experience has changed the way I view my system.

This screen shot will take you where you can watch the show.

This past Friday saw the World Premiere of the Chronicles of EMS Reality Series in San Francisco. Mark and I arrived a bit early at the request of Producer/Director Thaddeus Setla and were quickly aware of the extensive set up on site. Multiple large TVs are linked to laptops and cameras, all relying on a tiny ethernet cable to stream it all live around the world.
The chat room got a bit colorful at times but we did notice those of you out there reminding visitors to keep things clean, even if they refused.
Before we knew what was happening, Mark and I were at a table talking with magazine reporters, investors, friends and readers, all excited to see the first episode.
Although we had a really nifty schedule of events, technical troubles and the wave of people in the Hotel Frank made that schedule difficult to keep.

Keep in mind this is all being put together by Paramedics, not professional live streaming folks. We can’t afford them yet.

But when the show went live, the room got quiet and I went to the back of the crowd to gauge reactions. And the were 100% positive.

Thank you all so much for taking your own time and money to help us show the world what we did and what we learned.

The following morning Ted loaded up the cameras, Mark and got a few folks from out of town we usually talk to over skype or email to sit down and talk with us.  We fired up the cameras and filmed a sister show, A Seat at the Table.
satt1

It was more fun to film than I expected and we talked about a lot of issues. You can watch the show link for information on future table discussions and how you can join them live, each show has a laptop open to the chat room which has it’s own place at the table.

Whenever we travel with the Chronicles team, we hope to gather folks around the table and open the dialogue even more.

Thank you again for all your positive comments about the show, we hope to live up to your high standards in the future.

A Seat at the Table

Comments

Buried within all the excitement of the premiere of the Chronicles of EMS Reality Series is another premiere I’m proud to be a part of.

Over the years EMS has been serving their communities we seem to be finding ourselves out in the cold when budgets are doled out or reimbursement tables adjusted.  The practitioners on the street, in the patient’s bathroom, bedroom, living room, deepest darkest days are largely ignored when industry heads meet to discuss where the trade may go.

They’ve talked of minimizing standards to maintain a constant flow of low paying jobs and EMTs eager to step on the gas and run the lights and sirens.  Study after study showing one way is wrong so another can get a bigger market share.  All the while our pagers are going off and alarm bells are ringing.

If we’re lucky enough to have a voice in the discussion, we are looked at as an afterthought.  A nod and a smile greets our suggestions for improvement, often with a “we tried that before, it didn’t work” which is the EMS version of a pat on the head.

Various committees and organizations sprung up with a spot for us, among dozens of others, making sure we had no chance to be heard.  EMTs and Paramedics were never given a seat at the table.

So we made our own.

Social media has us sharing ideas and concepts in a way they never saw coming.  Research can be done from home instead of at a far off conference of owners and Chiefs all striving to prove themselves as having the best system.  We can now call their bluffs, and they can call ours.

A Seat at the Table takes one element we discovered while filming the Chronicles of EMS Reality series and expands it into a format rare in our industry: Video.  This element was the civil discussion of differences by street level EMS personnel who took the time to comment about what Mark and I were learning from one another.

There are plenty of EMS videos available for viewing online and by purchase, but never before has a filmmaker with a vision and a background in EMS taken up the challenge to document what we’re talking about.

Take a look at this snippet Ted Setla and I shot to explain to investors the power of Chronicles of EMS:

Chronicles of EMS – The purpose from Thaddeus Setla on Vimeo.

The Chronicles of EMS:A Seat at the Table is a table top discussion program filmed in the round and is scheduled to include as many people involved in the future of EMS as we can find.

Each time the Chronicles team travels, A Seat at the Table will be close behind to take advantage of the unique people we might meet and want to hear from.

Not only will we be sharing ideas, but getting answers to questions from those in charge of where we’re all going.  Mark Glencorse and I will be there but you will be as well, following each episode as it is filmed HERE in the ustream chat room (scroll to the bottom). When you listen live to the filming, Mark and I will be monitoring your comments and questions for the panel and including them in where the show goes.

That chair you’re sitting in will now be at the table, a voice in where our young profession leads.

Watch the Chronicles page for updates about filming in your area and if you want to be in studio with us, let me know. thehappymedic@gmail.com.

Bookmark the link to the Seat at the Table page as upcoming episodes, topics and guest lists could change suddenly as we’re sent all over the world exploring how EMS systems operate.

See you there.

EMS Today in Baltimore

Comments

chroniclesblogThanks to the Chronicles of EMS, both Mark Glencorse and I will be attending the JEMS EMS Today Conference in Baltimore, Maryland, March 5th and 6th.

It’s a big deal for us to be able to spread our message to as many people as we can and there is no better way to share ideas than face to face.  Even though we can communicate here in the internets machine, Mark and I didn’t really see what each other meant until we stood shoulder to shoulder in each other’s systems.

Since it will be a little while until we can get to everyone’s systems and learn from everyone how best to deliver EMS, heck even what EMS means anymore, we’ll travel as much as we can to meet you and keep the dialogue open.

That’s where our sponsor ZOLL Medical comes in.

SFFD Zoll Rep Roy Kniveton was kind enough to give the Chronicles of EMS team a run down of things coming from Zoll and let us put the new E Series through some quick tests.  Not any of that scientific lab type stuff, but medics dragging it around a room type tests.  Roy even offered to let the 100′ aerial ladder truck run over it to show it’s durability.

The truck officer declined the request.

But aside from coming in and letting us see what was new, Roy actually listened when we told him about our growing following.  He was genuinely interested in the EMS 2.0 movement and did some quick searching to see what we were interested in getting from our equipment in the future.

We must have done something right because our near future included a generous sponsorship in our pilot episode and flying Mark and me to Baltimore for EMS Today.  We will be Zoll’s guests at their booth and we’re looking forward to meeting all of you and answering questions about the Chronicles show, new concepts coming in social media TV and anything else you want to talk about.

I’ve never had anyone fly me anywhere before.

And to EMS Today no less.  Check out the web page HERE and look for JEMS Editor in Chief AJ Heightman to wander in to give you the details on all the exciting things happening around me and Mark.  Yes, there will be more than us ruggedly handsome frumpydumple fellows.

If you get a chance to make the premiere of the Chronicles of EMS in San Francisco on Feb 12th, we’d love to have you, sign up to let us know you’re coming HERE.  And a special thanks to EMS1.com and AAM Consulting (Randy Africano) for sponsoring the premiere event at the Hotel Frank.  More about them soon.

See you in SF.

See you in Baltimore.

Chronicles of EMS Caption Contest

Comments

All right all you twitter folk, I heard your call for the contest and I’m stepping up.

We’re having ourselves a little caption contest.

Mr Setla, my producer, and ninja trainer, over at the Chronicles of EMS posted some teaser photos of a brand new series in the works called Chronicles of EMS: A Seat at the Table.  This new web series is an exciting project we’re working on to open up the dialogue in our profession in a way that’s never been done before.

As a result, we’ve been testing and experimenting with topics, light and film and this photo is a screen shot of one of those tests.frumpydumples

So you’re wondering what I’m saying?  Let’s hear it.  Caption this photo.

CONTEST RULES

  • You can comment as many times as you like and offer as many entries as you like.
  • All entries must be here at the Happy Medic blog in the comments of this post.
  • I am the judge and will choose the one that makes me the happiest.
  • Entries must be made before 10 PM pacific time February 11th
  • The winning caption will be announced immediately after the premiere of the Chronicles of EMS pilot episode which airs at 5 PM Pacific on February 12th.
  • The winner will receive a Chronicles of EMS T-shirt to be supplied by me.
  • You MUST be present at the premiere or in the chat room during the premiere to claim your prize.
  • This contest is void where prohibited by law or llama, whichever comes first.
  • Foul language will not get you eliminated, but may be difficult to explain to your mother when the shirt arrives in the mail.
  • There is no cost to enter, but if you must, donate to the CoEMS cause.
  • The winner will also be invited to be a special guest on the new Chronicles of EMS:A Seat at the Table series in Northern California.  I’ll invite you, you just have to get here.

Hey, Box Jockeys!

Comments

This hose monkey has some questions for you.  Please answer honestly, anonymously if you like, but some things have been bothering Happy as of late.

Question #1

Does your employer discourage you from being honest with your patients when it comes to transport decisions?

Question #2

Has your employer asked you to omit information on your reports that would prevent billing a patient a certain way?

Question #3

If a patient asked your opinion, you told the truth and they refused care, would you be in fear for your job?

Question #4

Does your service encourage starting an IV or EKG monitoring for BLS patients to upgrade the billing?

Question #5

Are you aware that the above situations could constitute fraud?

If you are trying to decide whether to do what is right by your patient or keep your job, email me.  Your employer, municipal or private, paid or volunteer, is wrong and we need help changing their practices.

If you are comfortable and supported by your service when being honest with your patients about their conditions and transport options, please list your service in the comments section, they deserve praise.

ems2point0

HM

On the Ambo in the UK

Comments

chroniclesblog

Subtitle for this post: Can you reach that for me?

Coming off a superb time on the Rapid Response Car, nappy time aside, we’re on the vehicle today.  The vehicle is what you and I would call an ambulance, but since anything that can take people to the hospital is an ambulance, it needs to be narrowed down a bit.

The car is certified as an ambulance since it can take people.

The vehicle can, as that is the main purpose of it.

But hiding around town, and just out of camera range as we drove by were swarms of non emergency ambulances, almost buses in their capacity.  When asked their function, Mark and our ECSW Becky (more on her later) informed me they take folks to their appointments, get tests and from one facility to another.

Collecting my jaw from the floor I explained to them and reminded Mark how many times we activated 6 people to do just that.  Becky shot me a look from the driver’s seat of the vehicle and asked a great question I still can’t answer.

“Why not just give them a ride in a van or bus?  Why send the ambulance?’

Why indeed Becky, why indeed.

I could try to explain to her how, in America, people have become so expectant of lights and sirens whenever they want them that they’re willing to sue if they don’t get them.  Regardless of the condition, reason or outcome, folks will threaten a lawsuit and managers will blink and change protocol. Why inconvenience the few when we can just take them and inconvenience the many, right?

That was the start of my shift on the vehicle.  I’d love to tell you that life on a UK ambulance is so much different than in the US.  But when it finally gets to comparing apples to apples in these systems, having someone in the back is it.

Previous posts have covered my impressions of the ambulance layout and ways I think they can be improved to benefit patient care and provider comfort and safety.

Mark had difficulty accessing most of his equipment from the cabinets.  Everything he needed he got to, but not without ducking around the patient, around the family member, then leaning over.  The trash was also oddly placed, lying directly behind the family member so that to dispose of bloody mess you have to ask them to lean aside.

But that being said, with the current layout based on “safety” there is no other place to put these things.

Mark described to me the regulations in place to protect the persons traveling in the back of the vehicles and it makes perfect sense.  Until we have to actually do patient care.

After my description of the ambulances in a previous post I was contacted by an ambulance manufacturer who wishes to remain anonymous, I’ll call them Box inc.  Box inc wanted my thoughts on what makes the perfect ambulance and I told them I have yet to see it.  But, Box inc had some new ideas about making your ambulance more versatile when on post, more on that another day.  But Box inc will still take a van or pickup truck, rip off the back, slap on a place for a cot and make it flash, there really isn’t another option at this point.

But back to Newcastle and the McDonald’s parking lot.

Yes, we’ve found our way to the parking lot at the McDonald’s, on post if you can believe that, so I snuck in for a coffee.  It’s an addiction, I know.  We had a chance to talk on camera about Becky’s role in the NHS and what an ECSW is.  But as we talk about it, a few points to look for first.

I am sitting on the cot and Mark in the chair for family members.  The pass through to the cab behind him has a small door on the top that leads to the trash bin behind that seat he’s in.

The cabinets behind us and between as as we talk contain all of Mark’s equipment.  Just from the layout you can see how challenging it could be to access them with a poorly patient in the back.

YouTube Preview Image

When I said that Becky was above an EMT, the comments section at youtube went insane.  What I meant was that she can give pain relief without medical direction.  She can do something I can’t do, mainly because I’m told I need more education and training to deliver pain gas to those in need.  Becky is proof I do not.  So when I said she is above an EMT, I was referring to her ability to medicate them in that manner.  An EMT can transport, Becky can not.  Apples and Oranges folks.

Our jobs on the vehicle were similar to what Mark and I saw on Medic 99 in the City, moving folks with this complaint over there and that complaint over here.

It was on the vehicle that we encountered the only person, out of dozens, who demanded transport.

As you all plainly know, my clients demand transport 90% of the time and need it 5% of the time.  Newcastle respects their Paramedic’s opinions, likely because they can get in and get seen outside the A&E in a reasonable amount of time compared to here in the US.

This person activated 999 to report an assault and we entered the house cautiously.  It was quite a bit reassuring knowing that the occupant was most likely not carrying a weapon that could mow us down from 40 feet away.  I’m no ninja but I’ll take a clipboard to a knife fight over a knife to a gun fight any day.

The local police were close on our heels, again, without firearms (hard to get used to) and the scene was more than secure.  Very secure the police confirmed, poking holes in our patient’s story.  Then there was the recounting and description of the event given and none of that matched what we were looking at.

Clearly there were behavioral issues in play and the decision was made to transport based on the inability to confirm normal mental status.  We’ve all been there and trying to communicate with eye movements and physical gestures must have appeared as though Becky and I were flirting.

My eyes said “Look at the door, the things piled in front of it, it opens inward, no one broke in there.”

Her eyes said “What?”

My body, arms crossed, said ‘Over there, look, the door!”

Her body, arms raised to the side and shoulders up said, “Huh?”

Mark’s eyes said “Stop it!”

Mark does not ring down, or pre-alert, the hospital himself, but relays it through his control center.  When I saw what the control center did the next day, I decided that was unnecessary.  If your service relays patient reports trough a third person you are introducing another player in the telephone game and just another chance for pertinent information to get lost.  I would love to be able to forward my report to that point to the hospital and they can move that information to a bed and await our arrival.

Oh, did I nod off?

Right now my service gives audio radio reports to whichever nurse lost the coin toss that day and has to answer the radio.  I tell them what I have and why, vitals and hang up.

Many Americans may shudder at the idea of waiting 2 hours for an ambulance but I met a woman who disagrees.

Mary, I’ll call her, fell down on a friday afternoon and injured her hip. Being of a stoic generation, she didn’t want to bother anyone with her trouble, so she hobbles through the weekend until her doctor’s office opened monday morning. She called the office and spoke to her doctor who advised her to go into the A&E to be evaluated since his office had no x-ray capabilities.

The doctor called the ambulance and the call was classified as an “urgent” meaning there was no life threat, but still a need for a transport. This call is then put in hold in the system with a maximum wait time and an ambulance is assigned as soon as the system has the available resources.

Mary met us at the front door and walked us in with a slight limp, dressed and ready for her trip to the A&E like many of my lights and sirens patients. We took our time making sure her medications were gathered and the stove turned off, then into the chair and down to the ambulance.

Because this trip was arranged her medical records were waiting at the hospital, as was a bed reserved for her and she was seen as soon as she arrived. I asked her if the 2 hour wait was too long and she looked at me as if I asked her what color the sky was.

“I waited all weekend to call, another few hours wasn’t going to kill me, son.”

I wanted to hug Mary right then and there.

After a day of back and forths on the vehicle and torturing Becky with the American and the camera duties, we were close to finishing our shift when that dreaded job came in.

The late job.

We were planning on meeting some of the rank and file for a social evening and this job would put us over our shift and we’d be late.

We screamed through the streets of Newcastle, pushing old women off the road and opposing traffic wherever we could.  OK, not really, we were sent on a common case that would later bring out our common response “Same patient, different country.”

With the patient on board and her friend safely secured we made our way through the evening traffic to St Farthest, all the while talking and keeping our patient in good spirits.

The day went fast in retrospect.  Traffic still doesn’t get out of the way when you’re rolling lights and sirens, you still have to go hunting for the extra blanket at the hospital and the nursing staff is still often glad to see you when it counts.

The evening was a night out with some of Mark and Sandra’s co-workers, we were fashionably late after some creative dropping off and ride sharing.  I got to talk to them about Mark without him listening and their opinions were high and genuine.  Mark is a respected and admired Team Leader in his station and his system.

YouTube Preview Image

EMS as a Profession.

Comments

Fire blogger Fire Critic has made comments in the past about the mission of the modern fire service.  Heck, that’s most of his coverage.  I respect his views and check his site daily for news, advice and ideas to make my career safer and better.

He recently posted a question that has been being kicked around ambulance bays for a years. “Is EMS a Profession?”  In the post he made 3 main points about the EMS 2.0 concept that is gaining shape and attention.  I made a comment there, but wanted to expand on them in my own forum.

Just a quick note on EMS 2.0.  It does not belong to me, but to us all.  Anyone who wants to improve the way EMS is delivered is included.  Each community needs a different system, so there is no single answer to the number of problems we face from salary to education to resources available.  I prefer to focus on the system designs and transport options as opposed to advanced practice, which I think CKemtP covers far better than I.

Back to Fire Critic’s notes:

  1. At what point in advancing more in-depth treatments, on scene surgical protocols, more advanced medicine treatments, and all around increase in skills will the Paramedics be required to go to longer schooling? This longer term in schooling might mean that many decide to go the route of a PA, Nurse Practitioner, or MD.

There is a lot in there, so let me see if I can cover each point fairly.  CK may disagree with me on this because we work in separate systems and parts of the country, but I think we need to focus more on increasing our education first rather than adding skills first.  I think our patients could certainly benefit from in-field suturing, basic wound treatment and diabetic or respiratory treatments without a transport to the hospital, but as a young profession, we still have most of our brothers and sisters far below the training level needed for these treatments.

Paramedics in the near future should be at least an Associate’s degree, but even then 2 years is barely enough schooling for what we’re being asked to do.  If you want to take a one year program and get paid a ton of money just because you “got your medic” just quit now.  If you want to get paid better, get schooled and get on the road.

I have to disagree about more education leading to Paramedics wanting to go the route of a PA or MD.  If we want to make a difference on the street, a PA or MD will not help us.  Those who do decide to continue on in their education get my full support, but we still need better training than we’re giving now.

As Mike Ward mentions in his apparently ever growing post “The next Paramedic Shortage” the focus seems to be on getting undergraduate and graduate degrees.  I agree 100%.  if you think taking public speaking and statistics at a college won’t help you in the ambulance you are wrong.  a strong educational base teaches us decision making, how to learn and time management, not to mention the obvious benefits from classes like Advanced Assessment, Clinical Research and Systems Design.

A high school diploma and an EMT-P certificate means you have done the absolute minimum in our profession. (EMT-Basic aside, of course.)

2. At what point will this increase in overall medical knowledge require higher paying salaries?

As your Paramedics are better trained not only in their skills, but in how the system should operate, they are a move valuable resource to their employers.  They anticipate patient care issues, are constantly looking to self improve and understand they are a part of a larger system.  This will lead to fewer errors, better patient outcomes and a more successful company.  That should be something companies are willing to pay more for.  How much more is hard to say and will obviously vary by region.  Would you pay an office worker who does the minimum the same as the next guy with the degree and better results?

3. At what point will these increased salaries be realized as waste for taking nose bleeds (BS calls) to the hospitals?

When your higher educated practitioners recognize that a nosebleed is not (in most cases) in need of an ambulance, they can direct that person to a proper care facility or agency instead of the automatic default transport or refusal.  This is the situation that drives me today.

Our pal CK often writes that everyone deserves an ambulance and I agree to a point.  I think everyone deserves to have an ambulance available in case of an emergency.

Another pal Steve Whitehead did a popular post about the patient being the one that defines what is an emergency.  I disagree with this post.

If I call an electrician and tell him what to do with no regard for what he can and can’t do, then demand he do what I say, chances are he’ll leave.  If a person calls 911 and I respond for a stubbed toe, the person who called decides what level of service they get, not the highly trained expert that responded.  Why is that?

Paramedics, even the minimum requirement ones, know the difference between an emergency and something that is not.  We operate a service that has become all encompassing and people have noticed.  A higher trained work force can gain the respect and trust from proactive medical directors who can authorize their crews, who have been trained, to redirect that stubbed toe or bloody nose to the proper care, not the ambulance.  The number of non emergency calls that people think are an emergency will not change in the near future.

One of the major problems, as FC notes in his post, is the lack of EMS preventative care.  The American Fire Service has worked very hard to educate the public about fire safety, almost to the point that they are struggling to prove their services are needed.  EMS preventative care includes a lot of things people don’t want to hear.

Stop smoking. – I can smoke if I want, it’s a victimless crime.  Until you develop emphysema and call an ambulance every 3 days when you can’t breathe anymore.

Eat right. – I’ll eat what I want, Medic boy, you’re not a doctor.  True, but you’re wheezing just from lifting that triple cheese burger.   Eat right and your heart won’t have to work so hard.

Drive safely. – Shut up, I’m late.  And you’ll be forever late when you run that yellow light without seeing the kid stepping into the crosswalk.

Don’t stress. – You have no idea what I’m going through.  I do actually, since I got all that fancy training in college.

It’s a hard sell.  Making builders add sprinklers to a school is an easier sell than getting those builders to stop smoking, eat right, stress less and drive safely.  These things are seen as “liberties” or “rights” and something that no one should be forced to change.  If they can’t see the benefit to living a healthy life, how will I ever convince them that doing so will mean hey live longer and run less of a chance of being in my ambulance?

So when Fire Critic asks “EMS a Profession?” I say “Yes.”

The future of EMS is wide open.  The Fire Service is struggling to stay fully staffed and equipped as the non EMS calls are dwindling away and the EMS staff is overworked, understaffed and underfunded in most places.

Some claim we need less Paramedics to keep skills up, while others think putting a patch on everything painted red is the answer.  I think instead of looking at us, we need to look at them, our clients.  Clients are persons who knowingly activate the 911 system without an emergency.  Let’s get some of those people to stop calling us by getting them alternate solutions.  When we stop taking them, but they actually get results from the options we suggest, everyone wins.

God’s Gift to Firefighting

Comments

This is a letter to my associate the other day, God’s gift to firefighting.

Hi.

It’s me. The one sitting next to you in the back of the fire engine. We are part of a team, you and I, and we need to work together to get our job done. We each have our own responsibilities today and I take this job seriously. There are just a few things I wanted to point out that I learned in your glowing presence yesterday.

1. You must be one hell of a fireman, just look at your turnouts. Your pants are thick with grime and soot, completely dry and obscuring the reflective security features. Your coat is just as dirty, I noticed you wiping it earlier with those cow skin gloves from the warehouse store. I mentioned how easy it is to clean and care for your gear and you looked at me as if I asked to date your daughter. I’m sorry.

2. You don’t have to race for the nozzle, great one, for it was your duty that day. My duty was to ensure you had water and room to do your job. I was discouraged when you were unable to advance the line due to smoke conditions. I could see your mask on the regulator, near your waste through my own mask.

3. When we hiked up the 7 floors on that report of smoke in the hallways, I wasn’t just feeling the doors for heat, as I’m sure you knew. Even though you raced down the hallway to the next stairwell, the officer and I were checking doors by pushing slightly against the top of the door to break the weather stripping. That is how we found the unit that had the burnt popcorn. You were upstairs.

4. Your level of professionalism is, of course, without question, but your T-shirt said FDNY. We are not in New York, unless I am very confused.

5. I was not aware that I was the problem in the fire service today. You spoke at length about the wasted seat that could have a real firefighter in it, not just “some medic.” I was discouraged by this and still do not understand what you meant.

6. After our busy night of 6 runs between midnight and 6 AM, you mentioned it was my fault we were so busy and that you didn’t believe EMS belonged in your fire engine. I was reading the paper getting ready for another day of work so I may not have heard you clearly.

7. Throughout the day you mentioned large fires at which you contributed, sometimes mentioning work I did as your own. Suddenly my work, and the work of others, is fair to claim as your own at the dinner table.

Come to think of it, I’m not sure you are the deity you present yourself to be. In fact, I now question whether you understand the mission of the fire service in the 21st century. I may not completely understand it either, but I think I have a better way to find the solution to our troubles than blaming the other guy in the rig. Even though it seems as if I’m doing just that.

Trouble is there is more than one “God’s gift to firefighting” and just as many “God’s gift to EMS” out there, but what can we do to dial down the talk and dial up the action? We’ll see.

"It does nothing for the patient"

Comments

Listening to the EMS Garage podcast (Episode 45) discussing the Los Angeles County cuts to service, the conversation turned to the reason to have Paramedics on the fire engines.
The panel spoke of various reasons for the cutbacks, then took an interesting turn when the commentators had this exchange:

“They (Los Angeles) have Paramedics on their engines.”
“Why? Why would you do that? …There is no benefit. Why is there tiered response to medical calls?”
“They do it to support their staffing”
“It does nothing for the patient.”

This initially get me hot under the collar. I’m sure if asked to clarify their conversation there would be more explanation. At least I hope so.

Why is there a tiered response to medical calls? Why is there a tiered response to fire calls? Or to police emergencies? Why do we combine the abilities of different resources to aid as many as possible?

I am not for all ALS fire resources. Let me get that out now, before some of the single role folks start fuming. This debate has been going on for a long time, time to get it out here in the open and discuss it on it’s merits.

If you support public access defibrillation then you recognize the need for early intervention in cardiac cases. Get a trained set of eyes with a med kit in there ASAP. If the system in place has Paramedics arriving with or before Fire ALS resources, then I call into question the need for Fire Based ALS in that community. Then again, what happens when all the ambulances are busy? Who will administer that epinephrine to the kid who got stung? Who will cardiovert the woman on the bus? There are so many ifs, that having an insurance policy is not a bad idea. Could these be handled by supervisors already in place by the EMS provider?

I believe in a scaled response model, be it tiered or provided by a single service, but I reject the idea that my responding and treating patients from the fire engine is doing “nothing for the patient.”

Countless times I have initiated ALS care still waiting for an ambulance to arrive on scene.

Countless times I have been dispatched to BLS scenes miscoded by dispatch or exaggerated by the caller. As a trained Paramedic I can advise dispatch to slow down or reassign the ambulance to better the system’s ability to respond to legitimate emergencies.

In many communities it seems the answer to keeping the fire department in business has been to throw a patch and a monitor on a truck and claim they “save lives.” I’ve heard it said that the Fire Service is a budget looking for a mission and EMS is a mission looking for a budget. I like to think both are necessary, but no necessarily together in their missions. Some communities have strong private agencies who provide training and support for their crews, others not so much. In that case, it falls on the municipality to provide the ALS care. If that means putting competent Paramedics on a fire engine that is already responding, then so be it.

Too many cooks can spoil the soup. But when time can make a difference between an asthma attack and a resuscitation, I choose the early recognition and adequate treatment.

We’re all on the same team here, folks. Sure I’m a Firefighter/Paramedic instead of a Paramedic, but I try hard to keep up on both skills. That doesn’t make me any less of a care giver. I’m not slacking on my 12-lead skills because I had a tower ladder drill this morning, it just means that I can provide a service in a time of need as well as being available for a less common emergency (Fire.) I am very interested in learning more about breaking the Paramedic off of the fire crew for certain calls, whether that be in an APP model like Wakefield or a FRU model like the UK. Again, location specific based on community, topography and resources available.

I had to laugh when I listened to the next installment of the podcast, Episode 46, with the discussion of police officers with AEDs being a good idea because they can respond so quickly.

One or the other. Either an early intervention is good, or it is not. Why stop at AEDs? Why not encourage Paramedics to cross train as Police Officers? Because every police officer that responds to a medical call is taken off the streets from being a law enforcement resource.

Every bell I get to a medical takes my suppression unit out of it’s pre-determined roll as well.

A perfect example of a tiered response happened at my suburban home last year. You can get the full story HERE, but the first responder on the scene was a police officer in a car who happened to be a licensed Paramedic, but not for his agency. Then the ALS engine arrived and began treatment, still no ambulance to be heard. When the major carrier rig did arrive, they were the professionals I expected and did a great job. Why not get a trained set of eyes on the scene as soon as possible?

The response mandates are backwards in my mind as well. We have to respond to BLS calls in 5 minutes, but ALS in 9? Think about that. We’re required to be faster for the folks who don’t need us as much? That is based on the BLS before ALS model which , unfortunately, is the cheapest way to provide EMS. Get an EMT on scene and hope a medic can respond. I hear on the radio all day long “Engine 99, do you need an ambulance code 2 or code 3? – Code 3″ then the ambulance later clears on a refusal or a no merit.

I say dump that thinking right now. We need to break the mold of BLS first with an ALS chaser. Flip that model. Get ALS in the door first, then BLS can augment at ALS discretion.

There I go dreaming again, right? The privates think the FD is taking all the money and slacking on treatment and the FD thinks the privates are a bunch of folks who couldn’t pass the firefighter test. Let’s move past that. There are those on each side looking to go to the other side, always will be.

CK over at Life Under the Lights speaks of lifting the bar in EMS education so that the first person in the door in an emergency has the training and capabilities of modern day paramedics. Then CK would like to get the current Paramedic skills and training lifted towards the PA level. I was hesitant to get on board with that thinking at first, but if the only thing holding us from that reality is money, let’s do it.

But that isn’t our problem in EMS is it? Our problem is the folks passing through. Too often we are seen as a way point onto other careers. This was also a topic of discussion on the EMS Garage and I’m glad there are others that feel the way I do about it. So few reach the level of Paramedic and say “This is where I want to be” so they have no stake in making the system better. they’re on the way to RN or PA or whatever and are looking to get an adrenaline fix.

The point of this rant is that I take personal offense to the comments on the podcast that I have no effect on patient care when arriving on the scene in a big red truck instead of a big red ambulance. The commentators meant no personal offense, I know that, but I would like to remind them they have a very large audience who is looking for role models and leaders for the next 20 years of EMS. All care givers need to work together to find what works best in their communities and strive to make it so.

Am I obsolete in the Firefighter/Paramedic role? Maybe. But currently, the model making the most difference is a tiered response from a public/private partnership.

EMS 2.0 starts now

Comments

All the comments here, on twitter and with our friend CK over at Life under the Lights have called our collective ideas to change how EMS is delivered EMS 2.0. Hospital radio reports via instant message, electronic patient care reports downloaded wirelessly on arrival, care back in the hands of the caregivers, not the bureauocrats. Alternates to automatically defaulting to transport in an ALS ambulance to an ER.

Ok, EMS 2.0 it is.

The movement is service based, focusing on what can be provided by EMS staff and giving those providers more access to services other than an ER in a hospital as the only option for patients.

EMS 2.0 combines advanced practice paramedic services as well as a number of options for transport, transfer and relocation.

This new service revolves around a seamless network of emergent, non-emergent, clinic and community resources working together, not each service struggling to deal with eachother’s overload.
Imagine an emergency room that only deals with emergencies. Imagine a clinic that only handles acute, non-emergent cases and a physicians office where people aren’t threatened by large co-pays and 40 day waits to get an appointment.
It won’t be reached in my service time, but if we’re going to get there, the foundation has to be built now.

We’ve figured out the patient care thing, let’s move ahead.

Multiple colleges and universities now offer Bachelor’s degrees in EMS and Paramedics are retiring from 30 and 40 years of patient care to teach others.

We have arrived as a profession, let’s start to act like it.

I have taken the steps to begin the process of changing the system where I am, are you? Would you rather find a shady place to ride out the rest of your career? If so, I only ask that you offer solutions or keep out of our way.

No longer will the excuses of “That won’t work” and “We tried that 15 years ago” be accepted.

I’ve submitted a test policy through my chain of command. A simple change to make a situation we encounter often easier to deal with. It does, however, include a simple change to put just a little more power in the hands for the folks doing the heavy lifting.
If they approve it, it will make our ability to provide medical care easier and serve as a launching point for the next 4 phases of the project.
If they reject it, their reasons will give me insight into how to better propose the other changes and I try again.

We can only change the world if we work together.

Here we go.

I had a dream

Comments


I had a vision of Emergency Care in the Future. Then I awoke in a cold sweat, it was a nightmare.

The year is 2020.

EMS in the US is now strictly privatized. There is no governmental intervention in patient care whatsoever. All medical care was briefly socialized in the early 2010s but failed when over 75% of the population was obese or ill from chronic disease. A federally mandated national diet was enforced and followed, closing most of the fast food chains but the load was far too great for underfunded hospitals and clinics to bear and the system imploded. The private sector responded by reopening the hospitals and clinics to paying customers only.

After massive budget cuts, the Fire Service was unable to keep highly trained, highly paid Paramedics and EMTs on staff. Fire Companies were closed leaving only a framework in the event of an emergency.

When a medical complaint is called in, private ambulances submit instant online bids to the caller and the caller chooses the company to respond, being charged immediately, regardless of complaint or outcome.

Physicians have taken over patient care via hand held patient care devices which instruct a patient to speak their chief complaint into a microphone which allows the ambulance technician access to only the tools needed for that complaint based on protocols. Then the patient boards the ambulance, the technician applies the treatments indicated, and the patient is placed in a medically induced hypothermic coma.

The ambulance technician is not legally allowed to make verbal contact with the patient for the fear of violating the patient’s privacy. The ambulance was GPS guided to the call and the driver is never even informed of the service address, again for fear of loss of privacy.

Once at the hospital, the patient is taken into a sound proof room and thawed, then tended to by a staff of nurses and medical students. Only students are allowed to work in the Emergency Rooms, all licensed physicians are in private practice.

When a patient’s condition is stabilized they are immediately moved upstairs, into surgery or returned home with instructions to call their private doctor.

The ambulance will be randomly assigned to the next bid.

Nightmare indeed.

Where are we going with this?

Comments

Life under the lights has taken up the EMS 2.0 cause as of late with another great post about how he would like to see EMS evolve in the future. Have a read and come back.

Fired up? Ready to do something about it? Good, because you’re a part of this.

As CKEMTP mentioned, there are a lot of things he and I disagree about, but I love this field and how seemingly opposites can agree on the fundamentals of their profession.

Profession. I can’t stress that enough. We are no longer a trade and need to stand up to those who try to treat us as such.

A community based model is a fantastic idea and can work. At my first paid position, we operated the ambulance out of the Community Health Office and had a list of folks we did home visits on each day. Every morning we went to 3-5 houses to visit folks at high risk. Diabetics, known asthmatics who were in poor health and similar situations. At the time I hated it. I was a Fireman “forced” to ride the bus. It was a few years later when I knew most of my clients before we arrived at the scene, knew their sugar ranges and just how much albuterol would make them better. It made me a better care giver.

That was around the time I began my Bachelor’s in EMS program. Half way through it I envisioned expanding the EMS system to include a clinic based element for rural and suburban areas. An ambulance can respond from a clinic and transport appropriate patients to the clinic for minor procedures or along to the proper hospital. On their downtime they assist in the urgent care clinic.
I incorporated a fire based model to respond from the clinic and the system made little sense with dualing command structures and confusion in supervisory authority.
The basic plan still sits in my little notebook I used to keep my ideas in back when I thought we could change things.

I re-read it after reading CK’s post.

EMS 2.0, for those of you not familiar, is a concept of changing the delivery and abilities of EMS to adapt to the changes in patient presentation and tools at our disposal. EMS 2.0 is named such because we need an overhaul and upgrade of the current system, not just a polishing and reshuffling of the same old ideas. Painting the ambulances red doesn’t make the men inside them part of the fire service, no matter how shiny it gets.

Talking to the Angry Captain about some personal and blog issues the other day I commented about needing to get “less political” in the coming months. Since my command staff is aware of this place (Hi, Chief) I do need to watch what I say, but when it comes to improving the way we do our business, it is my responsibility to be a patient advocate and get things moving in the right direction.

I don’t have a political axe to grind, represent any trade group or company, I’m just a practitioner seeking a better way of doing things. I’m currently in a fire based model that is undergoing a transition and can see a lot of room for change and improvement, but I am young in the business.

Let’s fight the good fight.

EMS is not a Health or Human Service

Comments

I was informed recently that I am not a health or human service but a sacred cow.

Did I gain weight?

In the midst of the budget battles, somehow the “other side” has controlled hijacked the conversation, claiming they are above mandated cuts because they provide health and human services.

Health services. I’m pretty sure I qualify there.
Human services. Debatable on some calls for service, but technically yes, my patients are humans.

How did I become a sacred cow? Politics.

In what is becoming more and more common around the US, EMS professionals are being marginalized as other services are expanding, mainly those dealing with substance abuse and low income services. But where do these folks turn for help when released from the fancy detox and housing unit? After buying cheap booze that is…

EMS.

We gather them up and funnel them back into the system, all with a legally mandated smile on our tired faces. And I have it pretty good these days. A few years back some of our rigs ran the same person 2 or 3 times a day. We’d drop them off and they’d go right back into the streets.

A pioneering supervisor with a background in social work teamed up with the local homeless team, grabbed a surplus van from the yard and started making the rounds. They found regulars, got them off the streets and into rehab. Out of rehab and into housing. Out of housing and on their feet again. Or, which is becoming more common, a bus ticket back home.
The program was remarkably successful and I will expand on it when particulars are approved for posting here at HMHQ.

This program was recently cut due to budget concerns by the powers above the powers that be. Seems to me there is more profit in keeping some folks from getting better or out of town. There is a lot of soft money non-profit dollars floating around out there and how dare a small group of people make more of a difference in a year than a dozen municipal agencies and private companies could do in a decade?

Maybe I’m exaggerating, maybe not. We’ll never know why a successful money saving program was eliminated in favor of apathy. Here or anywhere, it all comes down to dollar signs.

Standing on a sidewalk earlier today I was told by a client, recently moved from 1200 miles away, that my salary could feed and house a dozen people and that my job was “eliminatable.”

“But then who would come and pick you up for free, take you to free detox, free housing, free food just so you can get drunk and do it again? Without us you freeze to death in the street.”

He had no answer, but no one passing out the budget money seems to understand that we are the first rung in the Health and Human Services matrix.

We’re that square near the top that says ‘Arrival into system.’

Support ALS in Your Community

Comments

This will begin an occasional reminder that ALS is not simply BLS with extras. Advanced Life Support addresses elements an 8 week EMT class barely covers.

I am not an “EMT Hater,” I am not looking to pick a fight with the “Basic for lifers” out there who take their duties seriously. This is geared towards those who think ALS belongs on an ambulance only.

All good Paramedics must be accomplished EMTs. I know that. But on a call the other day, an EMT with clearly no understanding of the situation told me I was in the wrong for checking a blood sugar before a blood pressure. (Altered mental status with bounding radial pulse.) He told me later that I need to “…put that ALS shit aside. BLS before ALS saves lives.”

It took me a minute to see what he meant to say, that BLS is better than nothing and ALS without BLS is clearly silly, but the underlying current is anti-ALS. Mainly because the ALS units here run more than their BLS counterparts.

Advanced Life Support begins when the bells ring and I combine my education and the information coming from radio. From that I can rule in and rule out possible beneficial treatments to conditions I may find. This way I’m not flying in the dark when we arrive.

I learned this business from an instructor who stressed “why.” Your patient’s pulse is 50 and irregular. You can treat it right away or you can find out “why” it is that way and treat the cause, not the symptom. Sure your patient is hypotensive, but “why.” It is often the “why” that can steer ALS in one direction or the other.

BLS treats the what, ALS treats the why.

When I asked my co-worker why he thought a blood pressure was warranted right that moment, he replied that was what they do, he didn’t have to care why. He asked if I knew the blood pressure by magic just by checking a pulse. I smiled.

Some communities are ditching Advanced Life Support in favor of a less expensive, but less effective, Basic Life Support system.

If you have ALS, fight to keep it. If you’ve lost ALS first response in your area, remember that the only rhythm BLS can treat is V-fib. By then it’s too late.

Enough.

Comments

Sometimes the obvious is difficult to comprehend.
Why can’t my system make common sense choices like this from Medic999:

“Its obvious that something is bothering her sufficiently to call 999, and in all likeliness, a further GP would just send her to the hospital anyway. I told her that I would run her up to the hospital myself, in the car, to get her checked out further. “

He can cancel the ambulance and transport appropriate patients in his car.

Am I the only one stateside thinking this is the right way to do it? A scaling system that can adapt to the changing call as it develops?
The American model is locked into a BLS before ALS mentality and it is hurting the system.

Benchmarks set to reach BLS patients faster than ALS patients simply because more of your resources are BLS is just silly. Yes, I said silly. We should be striving to reach the ALS patients within 6 minutes or less and let the scratched fingers and sick evals wait a little longer. They waited all day to call anyway.

My system has these same benchmarks and they were set in place when a BLS system was augmented with a smaller than curent day ALS force.

But now the volume is catching up and demand for ALS resources by BLS units is overwhelming the system everyday.

What is the solution, though? Adding ambulances is just like parking tow trucks near a problem intersection and waiting for the accidents to happen. We know what is causing the increase in call volume, why not nip it in the bud, where it starts?

The “patient.”

Patient is defined by Webster’s as both a noun and an adjective. But today, the two couldn’t be more opposite.

As an adjective, patient means enduring difficult situations with an even temper; Capable of calmly awaiting an outcome or result; not hasty or impulsive.
That is most certainly not the modern clientel of EMS services. They call demanding a level of service they do not need or understand, only so they can seek attention from an advanced system, the hospital, which they may or may not need. And all of it has to happen right now, no question, no delay, let’s go.

But the noun, patient, means one who receives medical attention, care, or treatment. “Receives,” not requests, or identifies with, but “receives.”

Does that mean I have not made patient contact until they receive care? Is calling 911 legally, technically, recieving care? Yes, unfortunately.

Why can’t I rely on my training and ability to assess people for illness and/or injury and define them as something other than a patient? Could that cut down on our call volume?
Absolutely. Would it spark a tidal wave of legal questions? Most certainly.

So where does it leave the average American EMS professional? En route to the hospital, that’s where.

WAKE UP friends! Our systems are about to be swamped with baby boomers hitting retirement and expecting the level of service they had to maintain for 40 years. If you thought we’re busy now, just wait 10 years.

Reading Medic999’s stories and then reading mine, I keep seeing distinct differences in the level of care provided by the systems. Medic999 is able to cancel an ambulance and refer the patient directly to the appropriate service, based on his professional assessment. That’s what we’re already doing, except the hospitals hold the keys to the services our clients need. We just move them from A to B, sometimes intervening.

If appropriate, again based on a professional assessment, they just need a ride, Medic999 can put them in the car and take them, leaving the ambulance available for a more serious call.

It makes so much sense it hurts to think about it.

So what is standing in the way? Profit. I can’t refer patient #1 to the rehab unit at St Farthest because they have a different insurance, who needs to have a referral from the patient’s primary care, who isn’t at St Closest either, but in a completely different HMO. And I can’t refer patient #2 to their general practitioner because, surprise, they don’t have one. Their only access to medicine at all is me, as a ride to a doctor, who is legally required to listen to them, clogging up a bed in an EMERGENCY room.

There needs to be a complete re-thinking of the way EMS is delivered in the US if any of it is going to survive the rapid increase in volume that is coming.
We can’t keep adding ambulances, we need to look for other ways to address the issues we face.

Help. We need help. We need a solution that can deal with the expectations of our clients, while still providing a competent, professional service that meets the needs, not the desires, of that client.
The UK system isn’t the answer, it can’t be so long as insurance companies can restrict access to services. But what about the fast car model?
Wake County EMS is having success with a variation of the FRU with their Advanced Practice Paramedic role, a design that interets me a great deal.

But in the end it really comes down to liability and cost. 2 things a Paramedic and EMT in the field have no control over. Sure if I can tell someone who doesn’t need an ambulance to take the bus I can save money, but increase liability. We can take everyone who summons us, regardless of the reason, which eliminates liability, but increases cost.

Enough. The fire based model won’t last long if it relies on an ever shrinking fire system and can’t survive in the private sector with the increase in volume and decrease in benefits.

Enough. We are no longer a group of certificate wielding drivers, we are licensed professional Care Givers.

Enough. The EMS systems can’t be governed by organizations that refuse to adapt to the changing landscape that is the modern patient, or citizen with a medical complaint.

Enough. We need those ambulances to stay in service for when the call comes in, the rare call, where we can actually use our advanced skills to make a difference.

“I’m sorry,” I had to tell the woman lying on the floor of the grocery store after fainting, “We don’t have anymore anbulances to take you in right now.”
After not 10 minutes prior being forced to summon an ambulance for a man who skinned his finger, who demanded transport.

We’re better than that. Now let’s get out there and do somethign about it, before it’s too late.

Humbly submitted,
Your Happy Medic