Homepage / Command & Leadership / Patient kidnapping - The cowtipping of EMS
Has Video Killed the Radio Star?! Dispatch centers tracking the wrong things? Does your confidence exceed your abilities around the homestead? This post is about fentanyl so you shouldn’t read it, you’ll OD Off-duty: Intervene or Be a Witness? Mass Shootings in a Small Town: What are Your Resources? #TapTapTime: The Latest Trending Topic Police Responsible for Ambulance Bills on College Campus? The Spooktacular Episode “I’m out of ideas” Advanced Airway Seminar HM on Medic 2 Medic Podcast Respond to the Rollover – Tales from the Interwebs Hazards we can most certainly remove Witty Banter with the Unaware – Volume 3324 the Crossover Ep 125 – Who Gives Two Sh*ts Why Giving Two Shits About a Patient is Not a Bad Thing the Crossover Episode 122 – Annual Kilted Show! Things keep getting worse for Cop who likes arresting Nurses My Beautiful Blue Eyes The Seizure Patient 500 – An EMS Race Crossover Podcast – Ep 116 – That’s Not Why we Have Cameras, Gary …for the head injury, PD on scene Crossover Podcast ep 113 – Middletown Ohio or Deathville USA? the Crossover Ep 112 – Are you a good hair boss or a bad hair boss? Stop Responding for Overdoses? Sign Me Up! Yup. Still Barfing I Heard You, She Heard You, the Baby Heard You Is there a Doctor on board? the Crossover Podcast – Ep 111 – Paramedic Perv Reporter Unclear of Aircraft EMS Operations The new rigs are here! the Crossover Show – Ep 110 – Do You Poop Where You Eat? What to do for an allergic reaction…or not The Last Shift of the Lost Cause The Crossover Show – ep 109 – Is that Cocaine or Anthrax? How to respond when your spouse tells you to be safe at work Always, In Service – EMS Week 2017 Lost Cause gets cocky FDIC 2017 – Structural Response to Aviation Incidents: Engine Company Operations I Got Lost Going to a Call – So I made sure everyone knew about it Crossover Podcast Ep 102 Mrs Happy Medic and Mike the Cop Arby’s Roast Beef Ad angers EMTs, not sure why Strippers and Cocaine watch – 2017 Seizures! Seizures Everywhere! Nothing is certain except death and taxes. I can help you with both What to do when the powers that be – just can’t. Episode 99 the Crossover Ep 98 – Off Duty and Fancy Free NO is Never Easy to Hear Ohio Cop vs Ambulance Crew Member on Video – Crossover Show Investigates! An MCI With Wings: Aviation Incidents EMS Today 2017 First in Ambulance MCI at EMS Today 2017 Crossover Show Learns How to Take a Joke To Haul or Not to Haul – Should the Complexity of a Refusal Influence Transport? Crossover Show – Ep 91 – ACLU cameras Tip of the Helmet – Bj’s Brewhouse the Crossover Show – Episode Eighty Eight Eminence Based Medicine If You Don’t Give Him Insulin He’s Going to Die Lost Cause Strikes Again the Crossover Podcast – Ep 85 – Florida Cry Baby “I Can’t Breathe!” you keep using those words… the Crossover Show – 84 – TN Bus Crash Happy 150th Anniversary San Francisco Fire Department! Thank You For Your Service? A Complete Secondary Assessment the Crossover Episode 81 – Let’s Talk Politics! Aircraft skids off runway, rescue task force ill equipped Crossover Show – Ep 79 – Do we need so much active shooter training? How to Ignore Everyone in the Room: Be an Intern Your Meme is Bad and You’re Not One of Us Anymore Goodbye tarps, I never loved you The Crossover Episode 76 – Flashback to the Beginning You found me how? Less CSI, More Columbo EMS Festival Standby – You can’t just park a car there the Crossover Show Ep 72 – Florida EMT photo game A&O vs able to make decisions Kilted to Kick Cancer Cops vs Firemen Writer calls for Medics to risk more in shootings, misses the target What’s with the French? the Crossover – Ep 69 – Twelve Ninety Désolé the Crossover Show – Ep 67 – Traffic Stops and Profiling Actually, Officer, No. It Really isn’t that hard to try When Patients Don’t Play by the Old Rules Letters in the File – Oklaloosa Selfies the Crossover Podcast – Ep 64 – Turning Passion into Retirement Why Pokemon GO is so much like EMS Us Against Us Apathy is worse than absence So Now I’m Back! Changes are a-comin’ The Sounds of Silence I know that feel, Bro TCS – Ep 59 – SHOOT HIM! CISD with OK GO part VI the Crossover – Ep 56 – Rooms for Shooting the Ballad of Big Dave the Crossover Episode 55 – Text me Bro

Command & Leadership, EMS, EMS 2.0, Patient Care

Patient kidnapping – The cowtipping of EMS


I’ve been sitting on this post for months and recent discussions on the facebook and around the interwebs are leading me to revisit it.


In an old You Make the Call we discussed when to take people to a  certain medical facility versus another and, sure enough, the topic of kidnapping came up.

It was reinforced in a (not so) recent story out of Florida about a man who claims to have been transported against his will.


Much in the same way Country kids sell the legend of cow tipping to City kids, I believe kidnapping of patients is an urban legend perpetuated by EMS managers and Chiefs alike to keep us from making waves and doing the right thing.  They need transport dollars to survive and taking people to their hospital of choice is an easier bill than not.

Are you confused with the definition, both of the word and the action?


kidnapping n. the taking of a person against his/her will (or from the control of a parent or guardian) from one place to another under circumstances in which the person so taken does not have freedom of movement, will, or decision through violence, force, threat or intimidation. Although it is not necessary that the purpose be criminal (since all kidnapping is a criminal felony) the capture usually involves some related criminal act such as holding the person for ransom, sexual and/or sadistic abuse, or rape. It includes taking due to irresistible impulse and a parent taking and hiding a child in violation of court order. An included crime is false imprisonment. Any harm to the victim coupled with kidnapping can raise the degree of felony for the injury and can result in a capital (death penalty) offense in some states, even though the victim survives. Originally it meant the stealing of children, since “kid” is child in Scandinavian languages, but now applies to adults as well.

Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill.


Taking someone to a hospital where they will receive medical care is not kidnapping as far as I can tell.  I’ve been looking at many different definitions of kidnapping over the week and keep coming back to the same definitions at heart.

If you do it for the right reasons, how can it be the wrong thing to do?

If you are doing it to get back to dinner, get off duty on time, or because your manager tells you to, THEN we have an issue since your position of authority could be interpreted as intimidation, but taking someone having an MI to a proper facility instead of local band aid ER is not kidnapping as far as I can find.

This discussion started when we discussed a patient who did not want to be taken to the appropriate medical facility for his presentation.  The discussion that followed revolved around him being “alert and oriented” “not intoxicated” and “I’m not going to kidnap him.”

In that situation YOU AREN’T!

You may do some research and find a term called “simple kidnapping” which appears to cover a slew of false imprisonments, holding without permission, and similar crimes, but in no definition do I find an example of a kidnapping being taking someone to the hospital.

Keep in mind your jurisdiction may have their own definition and you need to be familiar with it, but let me extend this one hypothetical step further.  If a person claims they need a transport and take me against my will, since I don’t think they need to go, is THAT kidnapping?  I’m being forced to go somewhere by fraud and could suffer harm as a result.

That more closely fits the definition of kidnap than taking a person to an appropriate medical facility, conscious & alert or not.


We are told not to disobey the patient and do what they say, take them where they want, and 95% of the time that works out just fine.  Your stomach hurts?  Sure we can goto St Farthest.  Your leg itches again? Kaiser patient, not a problem.  Trauma patient wants to goto St Farthest?  Aren’t we supposed to be patient advocates and do everything we can for them?

Isn’t EMS supposed to be patient centric?  So why aren’t we teaching EMTs and Paramedics what the definition of kidnap really is?  Probably the same reason we avoid teaching them what liability really means.

There are a lot of problems that will come bubbling to the surface if we started acting in our patients’ best interests and none of them are ours OR theirs.

A common practice in my jurisdiction is the art of hospital shopping.  A person will identify as a member of a hospital they rarely attend because they believe the doctors there to be superior, or that the nurses are prettier, or the other place “kicked me out” but in actuality they are simply trying to get someplace new, or clean, or where lunch is served at 1 and it’s 12:45.

In the pilot episode of Beyond the Lights & Sirens, I had a conversation with a regular named Val.  She presented with chest pain, 10/10, radiating, with history, a mere 10 blocks from an appropriate facility.  Her requested facility, 2 hospitals and 25 minutes away was on saturation divert, or no longer accepting patients by ambulance.  I transported her, per chest pain protocol, to a hospital that was not her requested facility.  No kidnapping charges were filed.

Many of you would argue I kidnapped her.  I moved her from one place to another without her consent using intimidation (My position of authority).  But looking at the situation unfold, I did not kidnap her, but get her to the appropriate facility for her chief complaint, as defined by my Medical Director, County EMSA, State EMSA, Chiefs and Captains.

Don’t default to the stories the Anchors tell you about kidnapping charges being brought against a long lost co-worker for taking Erma to the wrong hospital.  That case likely had a different, more shady reason for leading to termination, not kidnapping.

Perhaps we should spend less time worrying about vague definitions that don’t apply and spend more time in the airway lab?


And I hate that I have to remind you of all this, but these words are my opinion and are not those of my employer, a lawyer, an expert, my daughter, the crossing guard or the guy at Sears who stocks the vacuum bags.  Before you act on these words, consult with your local system administrators for the rules and laws applicable in your area.


Related posts:


  1. Fern the Fire-Rescue newbie February 26, 2012 9:01 pm

    But Justin,

    Take a look at what TMIACITW had over here: http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Most-Interesting-Ambulance-Crew-in-the-World/123822834370598?ref=ts scroll down and look at the nursing home refusal debate. I can see no difference between what you suggest and how kidnapping is defined in the eyes of the law. Psych’s, drunks, altered mental status, etc., aren’t kiddnapping. Bring in Alert and Oriented, and that’s a whole ‘nother can of worms.

    Also, it depends on how your state defines kidnapping. Sure, a dictionary is a nice thing, but the real definition you want is in your state’s law books.

    • M. MacNeil July 31, 2015 12:47 pm

      What about this: Say you roll up on a patient that does not speak english, and you do not speak his language. If you know enough to ask if he wants to go to the hospital, and superficial wounds have been treated / bandaged, and the pt says “No quiero ir al hospital” is it still kidnapping to take the pt, even if your commanded to do so by your Lt, Cpt, Chief?

      • Justin August 3, 2015 7:49 am

        M. MacNeil, thanks for reading and commenting. Let’s handle your comment last things first. I would argue that where you work there are local EMS guidelines or protocols that outline what you can/can not and should/should not do. I would also argue that rank has no standing there. So if I had a Captain or Lt or Chief “ordering” me to do something outside of my protocols and the patient’s interest, that order has no teeth.
        “Reliable translation” is a key phrase that should be in your lexicon for situations like this.
        I can fumble my way through an assessment in a few languages but to ensure the patient is aware of the benefits of treatment/transport and the risks of refusal I usually need a translator. PD is usually pretty quick with someone who can explain to the patient what my concerns are and I’ll always have that person witness the refusal.
        In your scenario we are able to understand the patient saying he does not wish to goto the hospital, my next question would be “?por que no?” I may not understand the entire response, hence the need for reliable translation.
        If we did transport him due to a language barrier I would argue that kidnapping is not applicable, you simply didn’t try hard enough to avoid the situation reaching that point. Let me ask you this though: “If your Chief “orders” you to transport and you don’t want to go…is that kidnapping?
        Thanks again for reading!

  2. mpatk February 26, 2012 9:17 pm

    I agree that taking someone to the appropriate facility is not kidnapping by itself.  However, patient hospital selection can also overlap with outright AMA refusals.  One example is the patient who says, “Either you take me to St. Farthest, or I’m not going anywhere!”, or the more common, “If you’re taking me to Poor Reputation Hospital, I’m getting off this gurney!”  What do you do if they really try to get off the gurney?  What happens if when you arrive at the hospital, the patient shouts that you lied to them and they won’t get OUT of the ambulance?

    When the patient links their hospital choice to a possible AMA refusal is where the spectre of “false imprisonment” raises its ugly head.

    • Alan July 20, 2014 1:57 pm

      If a person refuses to go to a hospital for any reason, even if it could result in their death and they are competent then there is nothing the medical staff can do. If they do they can and will be charged with false imprisonment and battery and will also be looking for a new job.

      • Justin July 21, 2014 9:49 pm

        They “might” be charged, but the assumption that you will be fired for doing the right thing is a dogma we need to move away from in EMS. A competent patient can certainly make their own decisions but don’t hide behind a false assumption that blindly following the patient, likely the least knowledgeable person involved, is not a defense, it’s an urban legend. As a QI manager I dealt with far more “Why didn’t they take me” than “Why did they take me.”
        Thanks for reading,

      • Shirley Desmond August 5, 2015 12:21 pm

        You are right , but this is being done all the time and no prosecutor will take on the medical System.
        People are kidnapped, battered and killed, sadly the hospital and doctors are getting away with a crime.

  3. Joe Paczkowski February 26, 2012 9:41 pm

    I think there’s a varying number of issues here, and if Glenn Beck has his chalk board, I have my lists.

    1.  “Kidnapping” is often lay speak for any variety of crimes against persons involving detention and movement.

    California Penal Code 236: False imprisonment is the unlawful violation of the personal
    liberty of another.

    Additionally, per a lawyer’s website (I’m not going to go pull up the case law, but the case used to define this is listed as a reference), ”
    1.1. Restrained, confined, or detained

    Courts have held that “any exercise of force, express or implied, by
    which the other person is deprived of his liberty or is compelled to
    remain where he does not wish to remain, or to go where he does not wish
    to go, is an imprisonment.”9


    “In order to convict you of misdemeanor false imprisonment, the prosecutor must prove the following facts (otherwise known as “elements” of the crime):

    that you intentionally restrained, confined, or detained another person, compelling him/her to stay or go somewhere, and that the other person did not consent.5″

    Source: http://www.shouselaw.com/false_imprisonment.html

    So, if the patient had capacity and a paramedic (given the recent “ambulance driver” blog discussions, I’m saying screw it, everyone is now a paramedic) transports that patient to a facility despite their objections and refuses them the ability to refuse care and get out, they have now deprived a person of their personal liberty and, based on a strict reading of California PC 236 have committed misdemeanor  false imprisonment. Your medical director, Local [county] EMS Agency, the California EMS Authority, chiefs, captains, and anyone else short of the state legislature carving out an exception (in which case you’re no longer breaking the law anymore than ambulances running with red lights is running a red light under the vehicle code) does not change the fact that you’re committing a public offense (i.e. crime). 

    So false imprisonment isn’t kidnapping, but it’s close enough that I’m not going to put paramedics through a ringer when it’s called kidnapping.

    2. District attorneys are elected (at least in California) to represent the people. Even if a person has committed a public offense based off of a strict reading of the penal code, it still requires the district attorney to file charges in the name of the People of the State of California. Somehow I don’t see that as happening unless it’s some sort of gross and stupid violation, not the standard, “patient needs [specialty center], patient goes to [specialty center], patient’s hospital choice be damned.

    • Thehappymedic February 27, 2012 1:18 pm

      All great points Joe, ansd it occurs to me we have more people involved in the “ambulance driver” definition discussion than these anymore.
      Depriving of someone of their personal liberty happens on most of our calls.  Patients without a need for transport will demand it and 2 of my paramedics (universal term) will be forced to go with that person to a place they did not want to go.  Duty to Act, it’s their job…I get it, but that definition more closely fits than taking someone who needs to go in.

      I’m not talking about Erma and her A-fib, or Johnny Ampersand and his chronically high BGL, but the conditions that will worsen if not evaluated by the proper specialties.
      The cases are very few and far between.  It seems the recent furvor over liberty has some Paramedics thinking that any person “who is A&Ox4” can sign a form and go away.  We’ve all had patients who answer all the questions properly and still do not understand the severity of their condition.  If they refuse to accept the impression of the medic, how is their decision informed?
      “I’m fine” after the 5 minute seizure with unsteady gait, but “A&Ox4” is a common one we see in my neck of the woods.
      Perhaps a seminar on what an informed patient refusal actually needs to include would be beneficial?

      Thanks for reading!

      • Joe Paczkowski February 27, 2012 2:25 pm

        The sad part is that this conversation is infinitely more important than discussing the word choice of the general public.

         ..and I get that we’re talking about patients who truly needs a specialty center. The patients who meet trauma criteria or who have a confirmed STEMI and the like. The problem is that patients have the right to make decisions, including bad decisions. Our job is to make sure they have adequate and appropriate information to make that decision, and in the vast majority of cases patients will bend to a higher medical authority than they are. However, as long as the patient knows what the paramedic’s impression and treatment plan is, and the consequences of not following it (including transport decision), how is that patient not informed? Bad choices are still choices.

        I agree that paramedics need a seminar, or really anything, on what makes both informed consent and an informed patient refusal. “A/Ox4” isn’t significant enough for either capacity or an informed refusal, and a paramedic choosing to force treatment under implied consent (which is completely reasonable and the correct path when the patient legitimately does not have capacity) has to be similarly informed. The decision to release AMA -and- the decision to treat under implied consent both needs to be able to be justified by the attending paramedic.

  4. Joe Paczkowski February 26, 2012 9:50 pm

    3. [I wanted this in a different comment since it’s a different issue]
    “Isn’t EMS supposed to be patient centric?  …

    There are a lot of problems that will come bubbling to the surface if
    we started acting in our patients’ best interests and none of them are
    ours OR theirs.”

    At what point are we becoming paternalistic in contrast to acting in the patient’s best interests? Patients have the right to make health care choices, including bad choices. Do we have the right to force a patient with chest pain to take ASA? Do we have the right to disregard a DNR because we disagree with “passive euthanasia” (the official ethical 50 cent term for DNRs)? Do we have the right to withhold pain medications to someone on a DNR even if it means you might shorten their life (thereby approaching active euthanasia), despite all good sense and most EMS DNR policies giving a green light to pain medication in that situation? Should the hospital ignore people who, for religious reasons, have a “no blood” card in their wallet?

    Where is the line where we should respect our patient’s wishes, for better or worse, or make those decisions for them? If you wouldn’t refuse to transport a patient to their physician’s office because you didn’t like the physician, then how can you likewise decide over their objections where they receive emergency medical care?

  5. Rogue Medic February 27, 2012 11:31 am

    Taking someone to a hospital where they will receive medical care is not kidnapping as far as I can tell.

    So, it is acceptable to deprive a patient of their rights, as long as we use the excuse that we were doing this for their own good – no matter how much of a lie that is?

    Using that excuse, which of us does not claim to know what is better for someone else?

    Why shouldn’t we just go abduct people from places where they would engage in activity we do not approve of?

    Why shouldn’t we abduct people and take them where we think they should be?

    Why not?


    • Thehappymedic February 27, 2012 11:48 am

      You’re describing the bulk of our patients.  As a Paramedic I have been educated and trained to recognize when someone needs evaluation by a physician and what conditions/events would impact their ability to make an informed decision regarding heir own care.  I am describing when a transport has been decided on and the destination is in question, mainly, but expanded my opinion outwards to all patients.

      Not the folks who are not patients, just patients.

      A person who refuses care and does not meet the definition of patient per my County can refuse any and all treatments they like at any time.

      A person with a medical complaint or who exhibits signs or symptoms of a medical or traumatic condition must be assessed and, if necessary, transported at my discretion based on the rule sof the system.  We are here for the good of the patient, as a noted blogger says, and sometimes taking them against their will when indicated IS in their best interest.  Leaving them to suffer because they are unable to make good decisions is bad medicine.

      Again, if they don’t have a medical or traumatic condition and are not experiencing an event that impairs their ability to make sound decisions, why am I even there?

      • Joe Paczkowski February 27, 2012 12:10 pm

        “A person who refuses care and does not meet the definition of patient
        per my County can refuse any and all treatments they like at any time.”

        Since there are two requirements (refuses care -and- does not meet the definition of a patient), does that mean a person who meets the definition of patient per SF LEMSA can’t refuse treatment and transport?

        The problem is that there’s a third option, the patient with a medical complaint or signs and symptoms of a medical or traumatic condition who has capacity, yet disagrees with your treatment plan or the treatment plan of SF LEMSA. Provided the patient has capacity, just because you recognize that a patient needs evaluation by a physician doesn’t mean that you can force said patient to be seen by a physician.

        • Thehappymedic February 27, 2012 1:11 pm

          Joe, certainly they can, if I am convinced they are able to understand the severity of their condition and understand my treatment plan and reasons for it.  This is often where folks lose sight of what is important.  They start basing their decision on financial issues, not medcial ones.  The SF LEMSA ensures that I treat all patients equally based on their condition and allows me to collect an informed refusal of transport, or an informed refusal against medical advice after consulting with a base physician.
          Tasking someone to a cath capable facility instead of non-cath facility during a significant cardiac event is not kidnapping.
          It is not their intended facility, but specialty care center recognition within the LEMSA dictates that his condition trump his financial concerns.
          Ah, managed care…

          • Joe Paczkowski February 27, 2012 2:35 pm

             I think that’s where we need to work better with patients. How often will patients agree to a non-network hospital if informed that they’ll have to be transferred anyways when their home facility can’t meet their medical needs. Similarly, I honestly wonder (since I’ll admit ignorance when dealing with health insurance claims) if the paramedic documenting the home hospital request and the reason for pushing for a non-network specialty hospital (including noting the LEMSA designations) would help with the insurance situation.

            In a similar light, how about checking on the other specialty hospitals in the immediate vicinity? Is 5 minutes further going to make a huge difference? Most likely not. Is 5 minutes further to the in-network specialty hospital going to make a big difference if the alternative is the patient refuses a specialty hospital? Most definitely.

          • mpatk February 27, 2012 9:46 pm

            Gotta disagree with that last statement about the LEMSA trumping financial considerations. If the patient is competent to make medical decisions, then s/he has the right to place financial considerations above health considerations. IMHO, our only option is to tell the pt that we will only transport to the appropriate facility, that they can go or sign out AMA, and hope they don’t call our bluff…er…hey recognize our concern and agree to go. Truthfully, I’m uncomfortable doing that, but I think it’s the least of evils.

            Just because someone doesn’t share our values (health over money), doesn’t mean we can impose our values on them. All we can do is insist we’ll transport to the right place and hope they’re convinced.

          • Thehappymedic February 28, 2012 9:19 am

            It’s not a values issue at all.  If they make a medical decision for financila reasons do they really understand their condition and are they making an informed decision?  I’d argue no.  But again, if their hospital of choice is closed to ambulances, I can’t take them there so we’re right back to taking them elsewhere.

          • Brandon Oto February 28, 2012 3:32 pm

            So your argument is that anybody who would factor financial concerns into a determination of transport (even, say, a $60,000 helicopter ride for the flu), is either not sane or not understanding?

  6. Pingback: Rogue Medic

  7. Brandon Oto February 27, 2012 2:02 pm

    Taking a patient to Hospital X instead of Hospital Y is not kidnapping. However, as mpatk notes, typically the strongest version of this story (and it’s not a totally unrealistic example) is that the patient says, “Take me to X or I’m not going anywhere.” I gather that you’re suggesting we turn the tables, and say — “We’re taking you to Y, or you’re not going anywhere.” And perhaps this would be okay, although it would be a very strong move in the direction of resource-management versus patient service. Since the underlying goal behind specialty destinations is, presumably, to give the patient the best care, in this case we’re essentially trying to get there through blackmail. We don’t actually think no transport is a good idea; we’re just trying to railroad the patient into going where we believe (maybe quite rightly) they should go.

    In other words, there are three options: 1) Go where we want; 2) Go where they want; 3) Go nowhere. Nowadays, we typically try to talk the patient into #1, and if we fail, then we bring them to #2. As you note, there’s probably no law saying we have to agree to bring them to #2. But if we refuse to bring them to #2, and they refuse to go to #1, then there’s nothing left except #3, or taking them somewhere against their will. Since the latter is indeed kidnapping unless the patient somehow, by hook or by crook, agrees to that transport, presumably we’re left with an AMA. (Or getting somebody to sign a piece of paper saying the patient can’t make his own decisions — a 5150 in your neck of the woods.) And I don’t think that’s what you wanted.

    • mpatk February 27, 2012 9:51 pm

      As I said above, the “my destination or AMA” ultimatum is essentially a bluff and plea at the same time. If the patient calls the bluff, the medic is stuck with two unacceptable outcomes: either take the patient to an unsuitable destination, or leave behind a pt who needs medical care and was willing to go to an ED but not the appropriate one.

  8. Pingback: Round 2 of Happy Medic’s Rules for Kidnapping | Rogue Medic

  9. Pingback: Get Over Yourself Bloggers – On Opinions, Passions, And Blogs | The Social Medic

  10. Too Old To Work February 28, 2012 3:08 pm

    I commented over at Rogue Medic, so I won’t repeat the entire comment here. I’ll summarize here for those who don’t want to go over there and read it.

    You’re right, he’s wrong.

    For mpatk. The choice will lead to trouble including frequent employer changes is leaving behind a sick person who needs medical care. Go over to Rogue Medic and read my entire not a legal opinion  comment.

  11. Pingback: Kidnapping? « It is what it is

  12. Pingback: Why some discussions are more pertinent than others | EMT-Medical Student

  13. Pingback: Round 4 of Happy Medic’s Rules for Kidnapping | Rogue Medic

  14. website February 7, 2014 2:56 pm

    Great article! That is the kind of info that are meant to be shared around the internet.
    Disgrace on Google for now not positioning this put up
    upper! Come on over and discuss with my site . Thanks =)

  15. mobile games April 14, 2014 12:56 am

    Greetings from Carolina! I’m bored at work so I decided to browse your blog
    on my iphone during lunch break. I love the info you present here and can’t wait
    to take a look when I get home. I’m amazed at how quick your blog loaded
    on my cell phone .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G ..
    Anyways, excellent blog!

  16. najbolje stranice za upoznavanje August 20, 2014 2:58 am

    Hi there! This is my first visit to your blog! We are
    a team of volunteerss and starting a new initiative inn a community in the same niche.
    Your blog provided us useful information to wotk on. You hve done a outstanding job!

  17. raya February 28, 2015 1:54 am

    What if a patient cannot speak for themselves and the POA says to take them to a specific hospital or they will take them and the EMT says OK we will take them to that specific hospital, the POA then heads to that hospital and when they make it there they find out the EMT lied and has taken him to the closest hospital? What is that called? And because the patient was taken to the wrong hospital the drs aren’t able to assist the patient due to specific medical treatment and thus they have to get ALL of the patients medical history and treatments from that hospital of which they should have gone. Hours pass before any information is released to the new hospital.

  18. Caprice N. Manos September 25, 2016 12:26 am

    I am a pregnant woman who was kidnapped by seven hospitals who engaged in falsifications to conceal my pregnancy as a means to take my person under color of law (violation Title 28 USC, Subsection 1201) and as a means to make me falsely appear as “delusional” while they falsely claimed that I was not pregnant after I was diagnosed pregnant Feb. 10, 2016 and Feb. 13, 2016 and where techs and doctors who were MD’s and DO’s not once got me an OBGYN and where they falsely used the laws for baker act that DONT APPLY TO ANY PREGNANT WOMAN, as a false means to take my person under color of law by falsely claiming that pregnancy tests in the fifth month allegedly read “negative” and while my babies positively shown fetal heart beats on monitors, they (sick in the head and they need to be baker acted themselves for committing such horrible acts on a pregnant woman with five fetuses) they pretended not to hear the heart beats and proceeded to slander me in records as a means to try to unlawfully divest me of my testimony in my open military abuse cases. Ie, if they can falsely make it appear as if a victim of horrible abuse and kidnappings is mentally ill, by kidnapping the victim and trying to murder the babies by pretending the babies are not there, then those doctors have now become the psych patients! I am eight and a half months pregnant with no prenatal care and am terrified to go anywhere after being released from that kidnapping and where many more attempts took place by more perpetrators as a means to conceal that last kidnapping done to me and my babies on 5/23/2016 – 5/27/2016; I am still battling trying to get the falsified records corrected where the perps falsified the records to make me appear as mentally ill so that my person can easily be kidnapped again. What will happen to me and my babies when I go to deliver them???! I know they are setting up to harm me and my babies again for the simple fact that no one is helping with the situation that has been notified! I’m moving fast for federal restraining order. The EMS people took me to a federal enclave to further be kidnapped after knowing there was no judicial order and knowing that such unlawful taking of my person was a kidnapping as they remarked at the “lack of facts” on a pink slip and where not one thing was written on it! Sick doctors who pretended to be OBGYNs and who were not in seven hospitals and who repeatedly falsified records and in one record in Florida, one MD wrote unlawfully, the actual date they intended to kidnap me, he wrote it in records a month prior. He is so going to prison….! I want them all to go to prison. They need the psych ward and I fear they will kidnap my babies right out of the womb. They went so far as to change my birthdate on records while imprisoning me falsely so that no one could find me. I have copies of that evidence. My background is investigations and paralegal and Army. They are stupid to do that to a former intern investigator and paralegal. Soooooo sick in the head they are. Ladies and Gentlemen: the doctors who participated in such grotesque and heinous acts, should become psych patients. I questioned them as to what they intended to do with my babies. I am sure they would have taken them out of me as hard evidence suggested. Thank God for the doctors who let me go but when letting me go, the bad ones falsified more records to smear me and to conceal the kidnappings. It was an interstate kidnapping and the laws are federal that apply due to my federal witness status and military status.

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *